Treatment Results
I openly share the results of my work. Real clinical cases and scientific data — without embellishment or false promises.
Honesty Is the Foundation of Trust
Each case is anonymized and published with the patient's consent. Successful outcomes and complex cases are presented alike — because honesty with patients matters more than impressive statistics.
Why I Show Different Outcomes
Oncology is a field of medicine where no two stories are alike. Every patient is unique: different diagnosis, stage, molecular profile, comorbidities, prior treatment. That is why I do not promise guaranteed results — I guarantee the most scientific and personalized approach to each case. Learn more about the doctor and his treatment approach.
All presented cases are real clinical cases. Names and details have been changed to protect confidentiality. Publication is made with written patient consent.
Each outcome is individual. Treatment results depend on many factors: the type and stage of the disease, molecular characteristics of the tumor, the patient's overall health, and the timeliness of starting therapy. The cases presented do not guarantee a similar result.
Patient Stories
Detailed descriptions of real clinical cases with analysis of the treatment approach and outcomes achieved
Female patient, 48 years old. Presented with newly diagnosed breast cancer, stage IIA. Immunohistochemical testing revealed a HER2-positive subtype. Before seeing me, she was offered a standard chemotherapy protocol without considering the molecular profile of the tumor.
I ordered extended molecular profiling of the tumor, which confirmed the HER2-positive status and helped clarify the biological characteristics. Based on the results, I prescribed a combination regimen: anti-HER2 targeted therapy combined with chemotherapy. I developed the treatment plan according to current international guidelines (NCCN, ESMO) and adapted it to the patient’s individual needs.
Complete pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy. At the last follow-up examination — more than 3 years with no signs of recurrence. The patient continues surveillance according to the recommended schedule.
Male patient, 62 years old. Diagnosed with sigmoid colon cancer, stage IIIB, after surgical treatment. Came for a consultation regarding adjuvant (post-operative) therapy. Previously offered standard chemotherapy without molecular testing.
I ordered comprehensive molecular testing of the tumor: microsatellite instability (MSI) status, BRAF and KRAS mutations. The results allowed me to select the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy regimen and determine the prognosis. I personalized the treatment plan based on the molecular characteristics of the tumor and the patient’s individual features.
Adjuvant chemotherapy completed in full. Over 36 months of follow-up — no signs of recurrence. The patient continues regular monitoring with control examinations per protocol.
Male patient, 57 years old. Diagnosed with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Sought a second opinion after another institution recommended only supportive care. The patient and his family wanted to confirm that all treatment options had been considered.
After carefully analyzing imaging data and liver function status, I proposed a combination regimen: targeted therapy with immunotherapy (based on IMbrave150 trial data). This regimen demonstrated significant survival benefit in unresectable HCC in international clinical trials. I coordinated the treatment plan with a multidisciplinary team.
Disease stabilization achieved with subsequent tumor reduction on follow-up imaging. Improved patient quality of life. Treatment continues with good tolerability and regular liver function monitoring.
Female patient, 54 years old. Diagnosed with metastatic cutaneous melanoma. Molecular genetic testing revealed a BRAF V600E mutation — a key biomarker that determines treatment strategy. Had previously received standard chemotherapy without significant effect.
As a first step, I prescribed combination targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors — a regimen specifically targeting the BRAF V600E mutation. After achieving a response to targeted therapy, I transitioned the patient to immunotherapy to consolidate the result and ensure long-term disease control.
Achieved more than 70% reduction in metastatic lesions by RECIST criteria. Significant improvement in overall condition and quality of life. Treatment continues with maintenance immunotherapy and regular monitoring.
Female patient, 51 years old. Diagnosed with high-grade serous ovarian cancer, stage IIIC. After surgery, she sought a second opinion regarding further treatment. The previous institution recommended only standard chemotherapy without molecular testing.
I recommended testing for BRCA1/2 gene mutations — a key predictive biomarker in ovarian cancer. The result was positive, opening the possibility of PARP inhibitors as maintenance therapy. This modern class of drugs significantly increases progression-free time in patients with BRCA mutations.
Treatment plan adjusted to include PARP inhibitors as maintenance therapy. Thanks to the second opinion and molecular testing, the patient gained access to more effective, personalized therapy matched to the molecular characteristics of her tumor.
Real Patient Reviews
More than 150 reviews on independent platforms
In accordance with Russian legislation, patient reviews are not published on the website. You can read them on independent platforms by following the links above.
Scientific Achievements and Research
My clinical practice is built on evidence-based medicine and my own contributions to oncological science
Chair of the working group: "Small bowel and ampulla of Vater cancer" (RUSSCO, 2025) ↗
Co-author: "Liver and biliary system tumors" (RUSSCO, 2025) ↗
Discuss Your Situation with an Oncologist
If you need a consultation, reach out. We will assess your situation together and create a clear action plan. All contact options.
By appointment only. Mon–Fri, 10:00–16:00 (MSK).